This scenario equates to taking an income in retirement. Even though the return sequences both deliver the same outcome on a portfolio with no cashflows, in a withdrawal scenario, weak returns and withdrawals in the early years (‘reverse’) deplete the portfolio substantially, and when the better returns come in later years, these returns are applied to a far smaller portfolio balance.
The result, in this case, is an impecunious retirement for those experiencing the ‘reverse’ sequence. Whilst withdrawing £100 (or 10% of the starting balance) is unrealistically high, the point is made. The sequence of returns matters, and upfront and ongoing planning is essential.
The value of retirement advice
It is evident that many people in, or approaching, retirement need to take advice from a well-qualified and experienced financial planner.
Choices to transfer from a final salary scheme, buy an annuity or set up a withdrawal strategy are highly complex. Tax and regulation make an already complex issue even more challenging. Modelling an individual’s circumstances and evaluating and understanding his or her requirement for income certainty is key.
At that point, building a suitable portfolio and withdrawal strategy – perhaps encompassing some pre-identified strategies for dealing with poor market outcomes – is the next critical step.
This is not a set and forget process. An insightful discussion on the progress of the withdrawal strategy is needed on an annual basis. Recognising and understanding the possible challenges ahead – and dealing with them before they become problematical is central to success.
In most cases these events won’t arise. But if they do, that is when a good adviser will earn his or her weight in gold.
To read more on this subject, download Volume 42 of our Acuity newsletter.